This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
How can “indie pop” be used to describe a major label hit song heard constantly on every major media source and sung by one of the biggest stars on the planet? It’s absurd. 2600:1012:B187:F0AC:1D09:B4C:4782:62DA (talk) 22:50, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Indie pop is musical style independent of whether the music is considered "indie". The genre of music sounds like something unique even when it is major label and successful. More to the point Idolator calls the song indie pop, so that's why it's in the article. They said the song is, "another flashy indie-pop moment with one foot in the (distant) past." Wikipedia is supposed to be a summary of published material, and Idolator is a valid source. Binksternet (talk) 00:32, 19 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
