This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
This article is very well written and well referenced. Good organization of subcategories. It could use some photos to help clarify things, and I think the 'related fora' section could be expanded. But these are fairly minor and I don't think worthy of holding up GA status. Cheers! Dr. Cash19:50, 28 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
I will get photos soon. It is raining today or I would take some. I may take some tomorrow. I am just worried my photos may be a bit dreary because of the weather. Maybe I will wait for a good spring day. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 20:08, 28 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
As a former Chicagoan, the part in the overall summary about the (seemingly initial) location of the park on the Near North Side at 901 N. Clark St is confusing. It uses the past tense which seems to indicate that the park no resides elsewhere (it certainly isn't currently on the Near North Side), but it doesn't specify that the park moved. Someone with more experience with Wikipedia, please correct the ambiguity.LandSurveyorV (talk) 23:30, 18 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing Sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I went through the article and made various changes, please look them over. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good Article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2007. I tagged one of the images to be moved to Wikimedia Commons. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would be beneficial to update the access dates for all of the sources. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:21, 27 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
