Talk:Vielmetter Los Angeles
Latest comment: 4 years ago by BeenAroundAWhile in topic Response to the above
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 22 May 2019 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved to Vielmetter Los Angeles. There is consensus against using all caps in titles but no apparent objection to using more concise newer name. Station1 (talk) 04:01, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Susanne Vielmetter Los Angeles Projects → VIELMETTER LOS ANGELES – Gallery Name has changed according to website vielmetter.com Svlap (talk) 10:01, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- The manual of style advises against capitalization of article titles. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Capital letters. For advice on how to render the name, also see MOS:TMSTYLE. The article should be moved to Vielmetter Los Angeles. The sylization can be achieved with something like:
{{DISPLAYTITLE:<span style="text-transform: uppercase;">Vielmetter Los Angeles</span>}}
- Oppose. The reason given is not good enough to flout established capitalization. You would never see such a blatant transgression of good style in any well-edited website or publication. You can go through reams of WP guidelines, and it all comes down to common sense. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 18:06, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- BeenAroundAWhile, I see you're opposed to capitalizing the title. Are you also opposed to moving Susanne Vielmetter Los Angeles Projects to Vielmetter Los Angeles? Vexations (talk) 20:58, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Response to the above edit
Hello, and thank you for the question. I don't understand above the proposed move that Vexations mentioned. I haven't seen anything about it anywhere. Sorry. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 04:06, 30 May 2019 (UTC)