Talk:Viejos amigos

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Film

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Peru Low‑importance

This article is supported by WikiProject Peru. This project provides a central approach to Peru-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.PeruWikipedia:WikiProject PeruTemplate:WikiProject PeruPeru articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Peru To-do:

Assess and prioritise articles (log)
Check for copyvios at Special:Contributions/Priscilla D, tag as {{Db-copyvio}} where appropriate
Create:
Expand: new articles; top importance articles
FAC / FLC: Peru national football team
GAN:
Merge requests: Amazonas before the Inca Empire, Chachapoyas culture
Review: Shining Path, Universitario de Deportes
Translate: National University of San Marcos
Work on Lima, the current article improvement drive
Wikify: articles needing attention

Notability

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

WP:GNG requires multiple independent, reliable, secondary sources that constitute towards significant coverage. Ref 1, a YouTube video, is a reliable source, ref 4 does not seem to meet reliable sources guidelines at WP:RS, with an about us but no editorial policies indicating a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Further, ref 5 shows it winning a minor audience award, whereas ref 6 is a trivial mention, both failing the significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) requirements. However, ref 3 is a full review that is probably reliable, and ref 2, while being mainly quotes and debatably SIGCOV to me goes into decent detail. Therefore to me whether it meets GNG is borderline. Alternatively, I don't believe that this meets any additional criteria of WP:NFILM, can you find more references, Phantom Oficiall? Many thanks! VickKiang (talk) 01:44, 7 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic