Talk:Vestax

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Mottenkiste in topic Technology: Straight tone arms
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Vestax. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:19, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Technology: Straight tone arms

edit

The article stated: "Baerwald ca. 1941 showed that the tracking error of a pivoted stylus could be minimized if the stylus is aligned such that it is parallel to the groove at two points along its curved path. As long as the stylus is set correctly there will be minimal undesired wear on a standard record for any style or shape of tonearm." This is flat-out wrong and misleading, esp. referring to Baerwald. The whole point of the alignment according to Lofgren (original researcher) and Baerwald (copycat) is to reduce the lateral tracking error and its resulting overall distortions by adjusting the tone arm geometry to match two null points on the groove area where the lateral tracking error is zero. This requires a tone arm offset and cannot be achieved with an all-straight, underhung tone arm. It has nothing to do with record wear. However, some argue that the (fluctuating) side tracking error introduced by the tone arm offset and skating force, that cannot be compensated exactly (but only approximately) by anti-skating, causes even worse distortions (and, maybe, record wear?) than the lateral tracking error. AFAIK there is no scientific proof for that. To my knowledge, the only real point for the all-straight tone arm is that by eliminating the skating force (and the anti-skating mechanism), the needle will stay in the groove more easily, esp. when scratching etc. I therefore deleted this misleading part of the section.--Mottenkiste (talk) 22:41, 17 August 2020 (UTC)Reply