Talk:United States v. One Tyrannosaurus Bataar Skeleton

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Species name

edit

In binomial names, species names are not capitalised, only genus names. How do official documents from this case write the name? What is the source for the name of the case? FunkMonk (talk) 09:06, 8 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Here is the court doc. I have no objection to any references to the genus names in the article referencing the species being uncapitalised but we need to refer to the main name of the article the same way it is referred to in the courtroom. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 09:11, 8 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I see. Seems the entire case name needed italics in the intro, though. FunkMonk (talk) 09:20, 8 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
Per MOS:LAW, names for articles about legal cases are styled according to the citation convention for the jurisdiction that handled the case. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 07:18, 9 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on United States v. One Tyrannosaurus Bataar Skeleton. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:42, 31 March 2016 (UTC)Reply