Talk:Undine (disambiguation)

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Favonian in topic Requested move
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.
WikiProject iconDance: Ballet
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Dance, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dance and Dance-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Taskforce icon
This disambiguation page is supported by WikiProject Ballet.
WikiProject Ballet To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Style edit

Please:

  • alphabetize the list
  • be consistent, use italics on all titles or in none but first check style manual
  • complete links to authors

Jclerman 14:58, 4 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

See Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(disambiguation_pages). Alphabetizing: A matter of taste maybe, but I prefer to put the most common uses first, or to sort chronologically. Besides, by which word would one alphabetize? Italics: Agreed. Links to authors: I agree with the Manual of Style that a disambig page should have only links to the disambiguated pages in order to be less confusing visually. --Chl 15:56, 4 March 2006 (UTC)Reply
Most common uses depend on the brain of the beholder ;-)
For me is 1st. Ondine (play), 2nd. Undine, Last Ondine (actor). For other users it's completely different. A neutral alphabetizing is the ASCII sorting algorithm. If the list would contain only a few items I wouldn't care about the order, but with such a long list it's a pain in the mouse ;-) to find an item. Chronological sorting requires that the user knows the date corresponding to each entry and which criterion has been used to asign a date... For me it would be like a blind date ;-) OK with delinking authors (I haven't read the MOS...).
Jclerman 16:10, 4 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Cleanup edit

This dab page was marked for cleanup per MoS:DAB. I deleted a couple of entries basically for obscureness or non-notability (e.g. not even being mentioned on the linked-to article pages), meaning (a) the creation of the/an article is rather unlikely and (b) it's unlikely that someone would search for those terms. I'm not all-knowing and all-seeing though, so please copy-paste those entries back where you strongly disagree and/or have made sure that the linked-to article at least mentions "Undine" etc.

sgeureka tc 21:51, 26 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Merge edit

The Undine page already contains most of the links in the other page which is tiny. Jubilee♫clipman 00:42, 13 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. I'll see if Ondine (ballet) can be made into a redirect. --Kleinzach 10:26, 15 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
  Done --Kleinzach 10:29, 15 October 2009 (UTC)Reply


I have just removed a link and renamed one so that there are only two links to the ballet Ondine (the Ashton ballet). The first is a link to Undine (Henze) in the music section, and this article is being rewritten to discuss only the score of the ballet, and the second is Ondine (Ashton), under the ballet heading, and that article will only relate to the ballet production and choreography. This therefore removes the issue of merging, if one article is about the score, and the other is about the ballet Crazy-dancing (talk) 13:56, 30 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
You copied and pasted the content of one article to a new title. Please don't do that. If an article is to be renamed, please use the move function, or ask for it to be moved with WP:Requested moves. olderwiser 14:20, 30 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Someone who knows how (that is not me) should add the opera Ondine by the Japanese composer Akira Miyoshi (1933-2013), which was produced in Italy in 1959 and released on a commercial recording not long afterward. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.107.116.151 (talk) 23:06, 11 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Water nymph edit

Re this edit asking source, many easily found with web search for Undine or Ondine, + mythology or "water nymph". A few examples from a quick search: [1], [2], [3]. -- Infrogmation (talk) 21:40, 26 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ok, but as the Britannica article makes clear, she wasn't a Naiad, she was only "derived" from them. So I don't think the entry should link to that article. Paul August 00:30, 27 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
The correct link is Undine (alchemy), which is already listed, so I've removed the other one again. Paul August 00:47, 27 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Undine is a semi-common word meaning water nymph, the only specific place I remember seeing it is in a science fiction novel, Shadow of the Torturer, but since reading that book 15 years ago and learning the word, I've noticed it in use half a dozen times. Webster's 9th New Collegiate gives "Water Nymph" as a synonym. I think a "water elemental" is an obscure way of saying Water Nymph. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.13.34.202 (talk) 03:49, 11 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Requested move edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved per request with Undine (alchemy) going to Undine. Favonian (talk) 15:08, 12 January 2015 (UTC)Reply


UndineUndine (disambiguation) – All items on the Undine disambiguation page refer to undines and are hence derivative of the supernatural creature, which is the primary source of the name. Also, "alchemy" is a really really odd/reductionistic bracketed qualifier. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:33, 5 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

That makes sense to me. If anyone is interested they shoupd go to talk:Undine (alchemy) since the discussion there is already underway and things will be a lot easier to assess if everything is in one location.--199.91.207.3 (talk) 18:28, 6 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.