A fact from UdiWWW appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 March 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
32-bit
editDo you really think it is 32-bit? in the readme.txt there is a note about win3.1 --> so it must be a 16-bit application. or is that wrong? mabdul 01:52, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
- Hey, didn't see your question earlier. He actually offered both a 16-bit, and 32-bit version of each release. At the brower's homepage at http://web.archive.org/web/19970709122604/www.uni-ulm.de/~richter/udiwww/index.htm, offers downloads to both the 16-bit version, and the 32-bit version. I've added a version chart with download links so you can test this yourself as well. Hope this clears things up.Smallman12q (talk) 20:51, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
new ressources
edita german bokk handles many things about mosaic and udiwww: http://www.amazon.de/Web-Publishing-CD-ROMs-Windows/dp/377238112X has somebody that book? or know it to read online? mabdul 13:56, 22 March 2010 (UTC) an alternative to the known archive.org address is this link. seems to be a mirror. mabdul 14:26, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Winsock Client Listing says something about 1.0 July 1955. The What's New from comp.info.systems.www.announce, Aug 1995 has a few links from July 15, 1995 to "BROWSER: UdiWWW 32-Bit Version + First Update available" but can't find text=(.Smallman12q (talk) 01:43, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
- found something different: http://mvalente.eu/1995/08/03/there-was-a-firefox-in-95/ maybe this coud get into the article. but I have no time this weekend! oh and what does that means: http://code.bsd64.org/browse/openbsd/OPENBSD_4_0/src/gnu/usr.bin/lynx/docs/CHANGES2.5 ? lynx on openbsd and udiwww? mabdul 17:09, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
My spell-checking of mine is disabled, even Italians aren't able to pronounce 'ão'...