Talk:USS New Hampshire (SSN-778)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

Cleanup

edit

Several phrases in this article are lifted directly from the cited sources. This should be rewritten in an original voice. 71.56.242.55 (talk) 00:29, 22 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Want to point out these phrases? We can rewrite or quote as is necessary. gren グレン 09:35, 1 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Christening date

edit

Rwbems added,

"... christened four months later, on 21 June 2008, 220 years to the day of the ratification of the US Constitution by the state of New Hampshire, ..."

And indeed, United States Constitution#Ratification does say that New Hampshire ratified on 21 June 1788. And as the 9th state to do so, put the Constitution into effect. But was the ship's christening date chosen for that reason, or just a coincidence?
—WWoods (talk) 05:58, 26 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Stephen Fry

edit

Is this not the ship Fry visited when he was touring the States? SGGH speak! 12:30, 26 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Block II

edit

Since this is the first Block II boat, it should be explained what the features are.Phd8511 (talk) 21:46, 21 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on USS New Hampshire (SSN-778). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:02, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply