Talk:Typhoon Chan-hom (2015)

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Hurricanehink in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Typhoon Chan-hom (2015)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 12george1 (talk · contribs) 03:04, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Hurricanehink. I will be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria to see if it is GA-worthy. As always, I see no major issues with the article, but I need a few things to be addressed or fixed before I can pass this article.--12george1 (talk) 03:04, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

  • The infobox does not mention the Philippines as an affected area
  • "On July 12, the storm struck the Ongjin peninsula in North Korea, and became an" - Wikilink North Korea, otherwise Kim Jong-un may come and find you :P
  • "reaching five storeys high in Wenling, washing fish ashore" - I almost asked about "storeys", but then I realized it was correct. I didn't know that was how it was spelled when referring to floors
  • Yea, I had to check that too. I didn't know it was spelled differently! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:38, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • "which killed 16 people and caused ₱3.9 million (US$86,500) in agricultural losses.[65]" - I saw in the infobox you said that the 16 deaths were indirect. Why didn't you say that here? Also, why no mention of the causes of death?
  • Because the whole paragraph is clear that these are indirect effects, the result of the storm increasing the monsoon. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:38, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • On reference #52, there's two problems: "Retrieved July 12, 2016. Check date values in: |access-date= (help)" :P
  • On the next reference, ". [en.yibada.com/articles/56747/20150825/zhang-ziyi-four-five-months-pregnant-new-source.htm "Zhang Ziyi Four to Five Months Pregnant, Says New Source"] Check |url= value (help)."
  • Ah, that's annoying that the url doesn't work unless it starts with http. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:38, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Overall, pretty decent. Just some minor issues that should be fixed/addressed in a timely manner before I can pass.--12george1 (talk) 03:04, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply