Talk:Tvärbanan
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tram vs Light Rail
editThe description of Tvärbanan was recently changed from light rail to tram, with the reason: Nothing parallel to the 'light rail' neologism is used in Swedish: this line is called a 'spårväg', which translates as 'tram'. That isn't entirely true. Tvärbanan was promoted as snabbspårväg, which is not a very good word, but corresponds to the term light rail. And it really doesn't matter if there is a good translation of it or not - Tvärbanan is a good example of a light rail system. -- Kildor (talk) 19:17, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- ‘Snabbspårväg’ translates roughly as ‘fast tram’ — it doesn’t attempt to position it as an entirely different technology as ‘light rail’ does. As for matters of classification, there is no clear definition of ‘light rail’ — it’s used for everything from full metros that happen to use small trains through to ordinary tramways, so it seems to me that using the term for systems whose operators do not would count as original research. David Arthur (talk) 19:34, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- My point is that the word snabbspårväg actually is the Swedish word for Light rail. And it is definitely not original research. In SL annual report 2006 english edition, the name Tvärbanan isn't even mentioned once. Instead, the system is simply called Light rail (and Nockebybanan is called Nockeby light rail). VTI has written an article where Tvärbanan is said to be light rail. And in the LRTA list, Tvärbanan is classified as light rail. -- Kildor (talk) 22:39, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Very well, then, if SL are using the term — it still seems to counterproductive to me, then. David Arthur (talk) 02:34, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- (edit: Although looking through their web site, I find references to them as trams as well.) David Arthur (talk) 02:50, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- My point is that the word snabbspårväg actually is the Swedish word for Light rail. And it is definitely not original research. In SL annual report 2006 english edition, the name Tvärbanan isn't even mentioned once. Instead, the system is simply called Light rail (and Nockebybanan is called Nockeby light rail). VTI has written an article where Tvärbanan is said to be light rail. And in the LRTA list, Tvärbanan is classified as light rail. -- Kildor (talk) 22:39, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Track gauge
editWhat is the track gauge? Peter Horn User talk 21:26, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Map with "J"-sign
editThe "Geographically accurate map" is quite good itself. But, the "J"-sign is totally out of place. This is the equivalent of the "T" used for the Stockholm metro and is used for the Stockholm commuter rail system. But it is NEVER used for tramways. Please change it or the whole map has to be deleted from the article. --Muniswede (talk) 13:05, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Tvärbanan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080409035521/http://sl.se/Upload/rapporter/uploads/000023206/SL%20Fakta%202005.pdf to http://sl.se/Upload/rapporter/uploads/000023206/SL%20Fakta%202005.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:20, 5 December 2017 (UTC)