Talk:Truls Mørk

Biography assessment rating comment

WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 03:34, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Discussion

Wonderful player though he is, he did not "win" the Tchaikovsky competition in 1982, that was Antonio Meneses. Which prize did he in fact win?

Didn't he also study, briefly, with William Pleeth?

Template

"Infoboxes are a net positive to all articles!" is absolute nonsense and as such cannot be used to justify mass additions. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:44, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

"mos,refs" and "see talk" is not descriptive of what was done to article. "rv: net negative" is a POV statement. This was not "mass addition," this was a selective addition of small infoboxes to articles that were mostly stubs and start class, generally long-abandoned and which you had never before edited. More to the point, I also didn't see previous edits by any of the other people in the infobox wars. These were careful additions, primarily to articles about young pianists who won a prestigious piano competition. Had nothing to do with compositions nor composers. Per WP:BB, it seemed appropriate to improve these articles and per WP:BRD silly to put in a talk page request for an abandoned article, saying, basically, "Nikki is it OK for me to add an infobox?" then you say "no" and then we waste months of bandwidth on the matter. It's a case by case basis, and these articles - all BLPs - need an infobox. Frankly, you are inserting your personal opinion here - and you are stalking my edits, which is completely inappropriate. Montanabw^(talk) 19:52, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Adding infoboxes to multiple articles in quick succession absolutely qualifies as a mass addition, and "net positive" is equally POV. Per WP:BRD, once you were reverted you should have come to the talk page rather than restoring the disputed edits. No articles "need" infoboxes; some are improved by them, but you need to be able to justify that on a case-by-case basis and with care. That has not been evidenced here, or on any of the other article on which you have failed to discuss your disputed changes. See also Wikipedia:WikiProject_Classical_music/Guidelines#Biographical_infoboxes; composers are not the only articles for which infoboxes have been found to be potentially problematic. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:28, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Truls Mørk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061016201451/http://inkpot.com/concert/sso001125.html to http://inkpot.com/concert/sso001125.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:21, 1 December 2017 (UTC)