| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Tom Wham be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Biography assessment rating comment
editWikiProject Biography Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 07:25, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
It should not be allowed to present a new article about a person, if you do not have a birth- year og -date to show (concerning persons still alive of course.
- That may leave out a lot of models and actresses; and for some people, a birth year is just hard to find. — Yamara 07:25, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Pen&Paper.net
editThe link http://www.pen-paper.net/rpgdb.php?op=showcreator&creatorid=3089 was removed from this page stating that there was no consensus to use it. I have seen that site linked to on a number of different designers' articles, and have added it to some as well. Is there a reason it should not be on this page? BOZ (talk) 22:20, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
- What about the material at the end of the link makes it a candidate for us to ignore our normal external link policies and include it for this article? -- The Red Pen of Doom 22:32, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not that familiar with the EL policy; where specifically does it fail? BOZ (talk) 00:08, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- For starters external links are for sites that "contain further research that is accurate and on-topic; information that could not be added to the article for reasons such as copyright or amount of detail; or other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article for reasons unrelated to its accuracy." - the link to the TW page at p-p.net contains exactly: a listing of 3 publications that TW contributed to. That is not by any means a sufficient reason for linking to an outside source. -- The Red Pen of Doom 15:28, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- Fair enough! It is pretty bare. BOZ (talk) 03:26, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- For starters external links are for sites that "contain further research that is accurate and on-topic; information that could not be added to the article for reasons such as copyright or amount of detail; or other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article for reasons unrelated to its accuracy." - the link to the TW page at p-p.net contains exactly: a listing of 3 publications that TW contributed to. That is not by any means a sufficient reason for linking to an outside source. -- The Red Pen of Doom 15:28, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not that familiar with the EL policy; where specifically does it fail? BOZ (talk) 00:08, 30 December 2008 (UTC)