Talk:Tino De Angelis

Latest comment: 9 years ago by 74.96.211.134 in topic Any recent information?

Assesment

edit

I have assessed this article according to the biography criteria as being "class start" and low importance as, at this moment in time, such an assesment seems to be appropriate in view of the asessment criteria and the artices content and subject. -*- u:Chazz/contact/t: 14:38, 10 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Any recent information?

edit

There's no recent information appearing online about him, so it's impossible to know if he's still a living person or not. Will stay at Confidence trick#Living people as the oldest living person in the list. -Mardus 04:26, 14 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

He was born in 1915, so it is possible that he could still be alive. Our policy in areas like this is to assume the subject is living until proven otherwise, or assume they are dead once they would be more than 123 years old (the age of the oldest human being on record). See Category:Living people for more information. Terraxos (talk) 16:12, 1 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
Individuals over 90 can go in Category:Possibly living people, which I feel is most appropriate for this individual. Cheers, CP 21:51, 24 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Per the Federal Bureau of Prisons website (http://www.bop.gov, 00593-028 was his inmate number), he's still alive as of this date (age 94), though I don't know how often it's updated. Lionelag (talk) 21:17, 18 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Tributes.com has an Anthony DeAngelis Nov. 2,1915-Sep. 26, 2009 Euston FL. Your guy? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.96.211.134 (talk) 02:04, 27 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Tino De Angelis/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I have assessed this article according to the biography criteria as being "class start" and low importance as, at this moment in time, such an assesment seems to be appropriate in view of the asessment criteria and the artices content and subject. -*- u:Chazz/contact/t: 14:39, 10 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 14:39, 10 December 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 08:52, 30 April 2016 (UTC)