This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I know it isn't the "largest wooden building in the world," but I do believe there is a plaque or sign there that states that it is the largest with no internal supports. (i.e. no pillars in the middle.) I don't know what the technical name for this would be, though. 71.59.215.197 03:18, 20 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
I don't know how it looks in other browsers, but in Explorer with on a PC, the infobox overlaps the next section, which I think looks terrible. I also prefer the images stacked on the right to break up the otherwise monotonous whitespace. However the list also isn't rendering more than one column for me. I know we once fixed this up so it looked good in all browsers. Can we try again? Katr67 (talk) 22:10, 25 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
The infobox has required fields forced and I don't know why, most don't do that. I moved the image out of the infobox and to the right hand and removed the forced columns if that helps.Awotter (talk) 06:13, 26 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Looking much better without columns, good eye. -Pete (talk) 07:20, 26 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Much better (at least with FF/PC), thanks everyone! Katr67 (talk) 17:04, 26 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Meg Godlewski has been doing some great work in OR/WA for Flying recently. There's a lot more to glean from- @Another Believer: heads up about buildings and places. tedder (talk) 06:08, 29 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
