This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image edit
Please refrain from removing the image again. Badagnani (talk) 23:33, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Clean up edit
I've cleaned up a bit, removing a ref that was a spamlink to a sales site and reformatting two "refs" that were actually comments. The only remaining ref is to a pay-for PR site, and is of dubious merit.
Although the article is interesting, and the group is probably notable, it has no independent verifiable sources Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:42, 24 March 2015 (UTC)