This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
As the section tag indicates, the critical response section fails to present any negative review examples, when aggregate statistics suggest between 1-in-4 and 1-in-3 reviews were negative. (At present, there is a single negative-leaning statement in the entire paragraph of examples, and that example was taken from an overall positive review.) The chosen examples should much better reflect the published review data distribution. 98.253.17.17 (talk) 22:31, 12 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
