 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Screenshot
editIs this gratitously disgusting screenshot necessary? VarunRajendran
- Actually, it does convey the premise rather well. -EmiOfBrie 22:58, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Necessary? No. Disgusting? Yes. Awesome? Hell yeah! :D
- Actually now that I think of it, the picture would be better off replaced, not because of content, but rather because the picture is a spoiler. We're not supposed to know what became of that character until near the very end -EmiOfBrie 12:44, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
- Most of the movie articles on wikipedia contain spoilers though. ~ IICATSII 17:35, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, but they also contain headings warning such that can be easily seen. There really is no way you can spoiler warn that picture, it just sorta jumps out at you. -EmiOfBrie 17:46, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- The whole thing needs a clean up, I’ll make an attempt at it sometime today. ~ IICATSII 07:19, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- Well it is the DVD cover, so if you brought the DVD you would be getting a spoiler just by purchasing it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.3.37.199 (talk) 11:08, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- Just for the record, Wikipedia doesn't concern itself with spoilers. Lots42 (talk) 03:27, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
- The whole thing needs a clean up, I’ll make an attempt at it sometime today. ~ IICATSII 07:19, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, but they also contain headings warning such that can be easily seen. There really is no way you can spoiler warn that picture, it just sorta jumps out at you. -EmiOfBrie 17:46, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- Most of the movie articles on wikipedia contain spoilers though. ~ IICATSII 17:35, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
See Also
editHow is this related to the Incredible Shrinking Woman?
Innocuous household product causes horrible transformation. Czolgolz (talk) 17:04, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
McFlurry
editIt is obvious to me, that The Stuff relates to the Mc Donald's Product called, McFlurry. In the End there is even a part of a Mc Donald's burning.
18.10.2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.2.128.182 (talk) 17:34, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- Speculation is speculation. Lots42 (talk) 03:28, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
The McFlurry wasn't 'invented' until 1997, a full 12 years after the movie released, so no. 170.170.59.138 (talk) 02:43, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Law & Horror
editMichael Moriarty (looking VERY young)/ADA Ben Stone and Paul Sorvino/Sgt. Phil Ceretta, a mere five years before Law & Order started filming. The big question is, did Michael Moriarty lose all that hair in five years, or was he already wearing a rug in this film? Serious question (trivia-wise). That aside, filing suit against the company that made/marketed/harvested The Stuff is more Sam Waterston's style, not Ben Stone's. 'Course, neither is blowing things up... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.246.198.30 (talk) 02:37, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- I was an extra in The Stuff, (the radio exec yelled at by Col. Spears). Anyway, spent a bit of time, talking between takes with Michael Moriarity, Paul Sorvino and Garret Morris. I can assure you, Michael Moriarity's hair was real at the time. No toupee or wig that I detected. Trivia Andre (talk) 18:53, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
- That comment's from 12 years ago in any case. But we also wouldn't have any way to verify your credentials and would need a reliable source, though there's nothing in the article about this one way or another, that I saw. DonIago (talk) 17:29, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Regarding the image
editOn 19 April 2014, I uploaded this image file, which displays an edited version of The Stuff's logo. I was wondering what to do in order to replace the file with the image found here, and if anyone else agrees that the image should be replaced. -- Matthew - (talk · userpage · contributions) 16:37, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
