This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
In the recent de-PROD of this article, Atlantic306 said there were four reliable reviews but as far as I can tell only Letterboxd and Slant Magazine have articles on Wikipedia indicating potential reliable source. And Letterboxd is user-generated content which would rule it out. Any comment? ☆ Bri (talk) 23:18, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
The four reviews are at the Rotten Tomatoes link and are Chicago Daily Herald, The Globe and Mail, Slant Magazine and Reel Film Reviews. The last one may not be so notable but WikiProject Film classes all rotten tomatoes reviewers as reliable sources so I think there is enough for WP:GNGAtlantic306 (talk) 23:29, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Atlantic306 (talk) 23:20, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
