This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I've replaced the original book infobox information removed without explanation by an editor with a score of Wiki edits, half of which were about this subject.[1]
No explanation was given, but possibly COI was involved. The book is an extensive scholarly reference. The movie is a popularization that spends considerable time explaining who the Nazi's were, dwelling on their pictures, and interviewing a particular person at length who has an ownership dispute with Austrian museums. The movie possibly suggests WP:BIAS.
I'm unclear whether both infoboxes are appropriate, if not, then the original, scholarly, award-winning book should be retained, not the money-losing non-award-winning film.
I've also replaced mention of the author winning the Légion D'Honneur -- surely significant to the article. A given a reference. It's unclear, KrakatoaKatie, why you claimed someone else won the award.[2]
.jpg){kind=small}