Talk:The Notorious K.I.M.
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Notorious K.I.M. article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | The Notorious K.I.M. was nominated as a Music good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (September 21, 2013). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:The Notorious K.I.M./GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Вик Ретлхед (talk · contribs) 18:56, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- Basic corrections
1) The intro doesn't summarize the entire content of the article, so it could use a slight expansion.
2) Since there's no composition section, the genres must be referenced.
3) You can write another paragraph in the "critical reception" mentioning the reviews by USA Today and others that were listed.
4) There should be explanation whether the samples and personnel were adapted from the liner notes or some other place.
5) The singles section could be also expanded. Take a look at Suit (album) to get the idea.
6) Split the charts and certifications into different sections. You can use the special table for the certs. And don't forget to add references for the chart positions.
Comment: Generally speaking, I'm concerned whether should I quick fail this. But since you've waited this long, I'll give you time to address the issues and then I will take another look.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 20:58, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Well then, the editor appears to be inactive in the last month and since the article needs a serious re-building, I'm closing the nomination as failed.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 06:44, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:52, 30 June 2019 (UTC)