Talk:The China–Pakistan Axis

Learn more about this page

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 9 September 2018

Latest comment: 6 years ago11 comments8 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved, as consensus not to move. (closed by non-admin page mover) Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 20:53, 26 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

The China-Pakistan Axis: Asia's New Geopolitics → The China-Pakistan Axis – Per WP:SUBTITLE. (The proposed title already serves as a redirect.) 142.160.89.97 (talk) 00:56, 9 September 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 22:17, 17 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Hhkohh (talk) 00:58, 9 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Oppose Seems a common name Hhkohh (talk) 00:58, 9 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Hhkohh: How do you reconcile your position with our book-specific guideline, WP:SUBTITLE, which states:

Usually, a Wikipedia article on a book (or other medium, such as a movie, TV special or video game) does not include its subtitle in the Wikipedia page name, per WP:CONCISE. The only exception to that is short article titles, for disambiguation purposes.

142.160.89.97 (talk) 01:03, 9 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

WP:SUBTITLE is not a policy, just a guideline, see also WP:COMMONNAME and other related policy Hhkohh (talk) 09:52, 11 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Support I see no issue with the requested move, and it abides by the given guideline. -- Alex^TW 03:41, 9 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
Oppose , only beneficial use of WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT here. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:37, 10 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
Oppose On a procedural basis I fail to see how this is an "uncontroversial technical request". Having the subtitle is beneficial to disambiguate the book from a theoretical foreign affairs alliance/concept. The point is made above that this is an example of WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT. AusLondonder (talk) 01:41, 11 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
Neutral on subtitle, but shouldn't it be "The China–Pakistan Axis" no matter what, with an en-dash (per MOS:ENDASH)? It's like "China–Pakistan relations". Paintspot Infez (talk) 19:24, 11 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
Oppose - guideline cited was based on a flawed assumption. Books and other media items are usually referred to the first time by the full long name and then for brevity, just continue using the short version. --Gonnym (talk) 21:57, 20 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic