Talk:Telus World of Science Edmonton

(Redirected from Talk:Telus World of Science (Edmonton))
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Paine Ellsworth in topic Requested move 6 February 2022

music machine

edit

should there be any mention about the musical machine in front of the front doors of the twos? it is (in my opinion) a rather important or atleast eye catching feature of the building

Rename

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Page moved. Consensus is in favor of parenthetical disambiguation here, and the supporters appear to have policy at their side. Ucucha 04:03, 15 February 2010 (UTC)Reply



Telus World of Science, EdmontonTelus World of Science (Edmonton) — To match Telus per acronyms policy, and because the comma convention only applies to "city, province" constructions. For buildings we usually use parentheses. --Kevlar (talkcontribs) 22:20, 3 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

No, it should be parentheses:
  • Telus World of Science is not a settlement
  • There are multiple Telus World of Sciences across Canada, one I know is in Calgary. Edmonton needs to be there so it disambiguates these Telus World of Sciences.174.3.98.236 (talk) 19:23, 6 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
I don't see how "it's not a settlement" is anything to do with it. This is geographical disabiguation (i.e. distinguishing it by where rather that what it is), so it should have a comma. 81.111.114.131 (talk) 23:03, 6 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
My understanding was that comma disambiguation is used when I higher district is involved or when dealing with cities, towns, villages and other settlements themselves (WP:NCGN), not simply as a general rule (ex: The Union Stations).--Labattblueboy (talk) 12:39, 8 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Comment I have moved the page to correct the capitalized "TELUS" issue, as that portion of the move is strictly procedural based on the naming guidelines. The preemptive move should not be taken as a comment on the debate between using commas and parentheses; that will be resolved through the consensus reached in this ongoing move discussion. Please feel free to ask if you have any questions about this. --Ckatzchatspy 23:08, 8 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • Support as proposed. The comma disambiguation is for places and not things as stated in WP:NCDAB. All other articles should generally use parenthesis for disambiguation since that is the standard for the wiki. This is not geographic disambiguation as some have suggested above, it is for like named things. Vegaswikian (talk) 21:42, 10 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Telus World of Science (Edmonton). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:46, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 6 February 2022

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Result:
No consensus. Closure requested <permalink>. See no agreement below after much time and two relists that the Edmonton TWoS is the primary topic. As is usual with a no-consensus outcome, editors can strengthen their arguments, discover new arguments and try again in a few months to garner consensus for change. Thanks and kudos to all editors for your input, and Happy, Healthy Editing! (nac by page mover) P.I. Ellsworth - ed. put'r there 22:48, 1 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

– This is the only venue currently named "Telus World of Science", and the one most closely associated with the name. The existing disambiguation page can easily redirect those looking for the venues in Calgary or Vancouver. 162 etc. (talk) 17:55, 6 February 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:59, 13 February 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 15:21, 4 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • To clarify: The Calgary Science Centre opened in 1987, and was only known as Telus World of Science from 2005 until its closure in 2011. The venue in Vancouver was for a time known as "Science World at the Telus World of Science", so that one is actually a PTM. The venue in Edmonton has used the name "Telus World of Science", both officially and commonly, for almost 20 years now. 162 etc. (talk) 20:55, 13 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Note: WikiProject Museums has been notified of this discussion. ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 15:20, 4 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.