Talk:T-600

merged

The previous content of this article has been merged (and slightly reworded to blend in nicely) with the T-800 article, as a result of this VFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:15, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

T-800

Only the games call them T-800s, the movies call them t-101s, this shold be changed (by them i mean the arnold terminators)81.153.53.63 (talk) 12:21, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

See the paragraph on nomenclature in the Terminator article. Does as good job of addressing this issue. Also, T-4 refers to them as T-600s. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.179.120.137 (talk) 20:28, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Blade Runner Reference

They call T-600s "skin-jobs" in this show? C'mon.. that's what they called Replicants in the movie Blade Runner. Must've been an intended reference. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.243.180.70 (talk) 08:59, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Cyborgs?

The article refers to the T-600 as a Cyborg in various areas. While this may be true in some situations, the T-600 is an Endoskeleton system that at best has been shown to dawn synthetic rubber coverings as a "skin". The "skin" its self has shown to have no living properties. The T-600 contradicts what a Cyborg is in a traditional cyberpunk definition of the term. The T-800s can be cyborgs, but they too are merely a computer driven weapon designed to look like a mechanical skeleton. At least the the T-800's "skin" is a living organism, which is the missing half of a T-600 "Cyborg". I'm of course using the street/cyberpunk definition of a cyborg, there are a lot of things about the T-600 that technically qualifies it to be a cyborg, but most hardcore cyberpunk fans like me don't immediately think of that definition. I think more of Bionics when I think about the T-600s, rather than a cybernetic/organic hybrid being. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Victis Kato (talk • contribs) 01:32, 30 May 2010 (UTC)