Talk:Sygic

Automobiles Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Slovakia Low‑importance

	Slovakia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovakia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Slovakia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SlovakiaWikipedia:WikiProject SlovakiaTemplate:WikiProject SlovakiaSlovakia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Current form written by employee edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please note that this page in its current form was written by a Sygic employee, Martin Kalis (user, LinkedIn). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kimsey0 (talk • contribs) 22:14, 17 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Neutrality of the Overview section edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I take issue with the tone of the Overview section. A lot of it sounds like an advertisement for Sygic's navigation systems. It cites primary (biased) sources and engages in bashing of its competitors. List of phrases and sentences I find most problematic:

"well-oriented travel"
"all-round full featured application that focuses on its wide usability"
The entire third paragraph for Google-bashing, which is unacceptable for an encyclopaedia.
"using the minimal amount of memory on their devices" (based on bad source)

--78.34.219.8 (talk) 21:44, 4 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic