Talk:Spanish conquest of El Salvador

Active discussions

GA ReviewEdit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Spanish conquest of El Salvador/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk · contribs) 17:37, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

"...advantage in terms of weaponry."

A lot of the claims made in the sources cited in regards to the degree of the advantage provided by weapons used in battle sound nothing more than conjecture or one-sided agenda driven accounts. With a large portion of the population dying or physically weakened by diseases, in all likelihood that was a bigger contributing factor than war, let alone weaponry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 12:40, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
    Checked with Eargwig's Copy vio detector. 17.4%--refers back to sources credited, and key words and phrases. Nothing I found extraordinary.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    Nicely done, and I commend you on your persistence with this and Spanish conquest of Honduras
  7. Overall:
    auntieruth (talk) 17:46, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Return to "Spanish conquest of El Salvador" page.