Talk:Society for American Baseball Research

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 March 2019 and 8 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kxie16.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:41, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sabermetrics article needs review

edit

A group of anon posters who appear to be trying to sell stat services and computer games made a series of vanity posts on the Sabermetrics article. I have reverted the article to its pre-anon form, but in the process I may have also eliminated some legitimate non-vanity edits. The same vanity posts have been made elsewhere, including Defense independent pitching statistics. Please review and edit Sabermetrics since I don't know the material well enough to judge the changes that are not obvious sales pitches. OverInsured 06:41, 9 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Speaker at the 1989 Convention

edit

I'm fairly certain that the speaker at the '89 Convention in Albany was not the pop-star, Bobby Brown, but rather this Bobby Brown.

Deletions of sabermetric statistics and projections

edit

Those who are interested in Sabermetrics may be interested in the ongoing discussion re deletion of urls that include projections of Bill James and others, as well as of other baseball stats, which can be found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Baseball#Deletions_by_Tecmobowl_of_hundreds_of_baseball_urls_w.2Funique_information.3B_failure_to_discuss.3B_edit_warring . --Epeefleche 20:51, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

SABRE

edit

About 1971, I recall a report by Heywood Hale Broun on the CBS Evening News about an on organization called the Society of American Baseball Research Enthusiasts (SABRE). I am quite sure it had an "E" and I am quite sure that the word was "enthusiasts". Why can't I find any mention of this name?  Randall Bart   Talk  02:09, 3 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Prominent members

edit

The Background section names "some of the more prominent members". I think this should be expressed historically so that no update is necessary when someone dies or permits membership to lapse. Is there any other principle at stake? --P64 (talk) 19:29, 27 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Are you all just gonna be dumb your whole lives or if it's gonna last until I get done speaking

edit

Take it down or I will bless you like the murder and piece of craps you are 2600:1700:2A10:2290:5DD5:1DDE:796E:7825 (talk) 10:15, 19 April 2022 (UTC)Reply