Talk:Six Sex Scenes

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Lijil in topic Notability

Notability

edit

User:TimothyBlue questioned the notability of this work. Per WP:NBOOK a literary work is notable if it "has been the subject of two or more non-trivialpublished works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself." There are three peer-reviewed articles in the references cited in the article, which clearly exceeds this requirement. Lijil (talk) 19:27, 10 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

I am removing the template questioning the topic's notability since there's been no response. See table of sources below. Lijil (talk) 06:44, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
Picot, Edward (2002). "Some versions of hyperfiction". PN Review. 22 (2) – via ProQuest.   Peer-reviewed scholarly article.   Peer-reviewed scholarly article.   More than 1200 words specifically about this work. Yes
Miles, Adrian (2001-09-10). "Hypertext structure as the event of connection" (PDF). Proceedings of the 12th ACM conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia. HYPERTEXT '01. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery: 61–68. doi:10.1145/504216.504236. ISBN 978-1-58113-420-9.   Peer-reviewed scholarly paper   Peer-reviewed scholarly paper ~ Brief mention ~ Partial
Bernstein, Mark (1998-05-01). "Patterns of hypertext". Proceedings of the ninth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia : links, objects, time and space---structure in hypermedia systems: links, objects, time and space---structure in hypermedia systems. HYPERTEXT '98. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery: 21–29. doi:10.1145/276627.276630.   Peer-reviewed scholarly paper   Peer-reviewed scholarly paper   Used as primary example of the "counterpoint" structure in hypertext fiction Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.