This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The 52 is based on c/ns, which run from 1-53 but with 11 and 50 missing and (strangely) a 3 and an 03. These two are F-CCCZ and F-CCUC, according to the French reg. So c/ns total 52. This register lists 51 French aircraft with their c/ns, though c/n 53 has had two serials and so appears twice (F-CIGL and F-CDGL). c/n 8 is not in this list but appears on the US reg; presumably never registered in France. Not sure what forces French aircraft completely off the reg, rather than just being marked radié.TSRL (talk) 16:51, 8 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Given the C.30 was the Edelweiss and the C.34 the Edelweiss IV, you might expect E II, III at least. No sign of them yet. Anyone know more?TSRL (talk) 16:51, 8 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
