This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Sigobert the Lame is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Since you keep reverting my removal of it, I will explain here my reasoning. I am not trying to remove legitimate or useful links to related topics. But I think the relation between the topic should be made by its mention in the article with a link there, not in a detached section with a list. This lack of context does not immediately aid the reader and can lead to sections with unimportant links or with links the inclusion of which is not NPOV. Stylistically it is also less than optimum, in my opinion. I'd be happy to see those links turn blue from red and incorporated into the article if they are directly related to Sigobert in some fashion. Srnec 02:33, 17 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
If this is really your point then why didn't you add a simple phrase in the text? I wouldn't mind a HELPFULL contribution. You are invited. johanthon 07:38, 17 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
I don't understand your dispute. What is it about? Whatever you do, don't list redlinks under "see also", it's pointless. dab(𒁳) 08:01, 17 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
