Talk:Serb National Council

Croatia Low‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Serbia Low‑importance

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved by Joy (talk · contribs) as uncontroversial (non-admin, housekeeping closure). Jenks24 (talk) 09:50, 24 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Serbian National Council → Serb National Council — Per the organization's official webpage. Also, "Serbian" implies [[Serbia]]n while "Serb" implies [[Serbs|Serb]], and the latter is correct, while the former isn't. GregorB (talk) 10:07, 23 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Survey edit

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Wait, what? This is not a contentious move. You simply couldn't do it yourself because the incoming redirect has two extra revisions of history, I guess? --Joy [shallot] (talk) 19:37, 23 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Discussion edit

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic