 | A fact from Scott Barry appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 September 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vandalism edit
Stop it. If you want to add something to Barry's page, it must be sourced, must be neutrally worded and free from bias. All vandalism will be removed. RefereeOrganist (talk) 07:38, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
I cleaned it up. Previous vandalism, recently more of NPOV and unsourced editorial statements. Anticipate very few issues during the baseball offseason. RefereeOrganist (talk) 22:09, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- None of what you removed was "vandalism" and you removed cited content without any explanation. You should read up on what vandalism actually means. — KV5 • Talk • 22:19, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Was the content against policy? Yes. End of discussion. RefereeOrganist (talk) 22:21, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- Um, no. You have not cited any policy of which this content was in contravention. Please elaborate in detail, using examples, instead of being dismissive and rude. — KV5 • Talk • 22:24, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
As I stated, previous vandalism (see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scott_Barry&oldid=380958011), recently NPOV and unsourced material. RefereeOrganist (talk) 22:57, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- OK, now I see the vandalism. I fail, in all of your changes, to see NPOV violations or removal of unsourced material. As I said above, you removed sourced material, which I restored. — KV5 • Talk • 11:29, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
No problem. I reworded the Mike Winters replacement sentences. The previous phrasing implied cause-effect, I changed it to read more matter-of-fact. Let me know if you disagree RefereeOrganist (talk) 06:42, 12 November 2011 (UTC)