This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The reason why I believe the Sexopolis Award win is notable (I have seen the listing removed from other articles) is because her having won it received good coverage in the porn world, as evidenced by the sources in the article. ErpertWho is this guy? | Wanna talk about it?11:35, 22 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
she isnt really that notable other than being a pornstar hired by a gaming company to sell more games to kids... outside of the streaming D&D world and pornhub, she is nobody. i am not sure who added the notability guideline thing here, but that is all she has really done of note. nothing anyone would care about globally.
4th edition of the game D&D had lots of pornstars come in from some show called "D&D with Pornstars" to help playtest and give opinions on the game and she might hae been one in that crowd? the rest of them even the one that started the "with pornstars" thing is never spoken of in D&D now even. all i could find is her streaming and youtube based on RPGs, her connections with Geek & Sundry and pornhub, or her sex clothing line or whatever listed in the article or somewhere on her own website. it ha been a while since editing wiki, is that banner calling for a vote or suggesting it?
while i don't care for the girl and agree she is not notable outside of her "fields", she is known to people in those industries alongside Matt Mercer. the "homecoming king and queen" of streaming RPGs basically, if that analogy works. shadzar-talk07:27, 14 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
Your last paragraph kind of disproves the assertion you make in your first sentence. She is notable in her field. An expert philatelist may never of heard of Dr. Spock, but that doesn't make him non-notable. Additionally, if WP were to use your implied notability criteria, there are a great many good articles that would need to be purged for non-notability. I would agree, however, that adult stars (porn performers) should not have WP entries on the simple basis that in fifty years time, will anyone know of, or care about, even the most luminary of stars, such as Christy Canyon or Amber Lynn? Probably not. But, unless you can get WP to just say "that's it, we're deleting the pornstar articles," you're going to have to just deal with it. 198.70.2.200 (talk) 17:10, 29 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
