Talk:Santa Barbara Independent

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The paper's slant, according to the editor edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Libertarian? We all know it's liberal, and the editor says so -- but libertarian? Really? I don't see it in the reference provided ([[1]]) I don't want to put original research in the article, but I've been reading the Independent for a long time, and it seems actively hostile to a lot of traditional "libertarian" points of view. Antandrus (talk) 05:13, 2 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Circulation figures edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Shall we stick to WP:Reliable sources when we report on circulation figures? This paper is vetted by Verified Audit Circulation (VAC). Yours for accuracy, GeorgeLouis (talk) 14:01, 13 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic