| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Comment edit
It's a good article but does anyone know where the hell I can find a CD copy of Surf Nicaragua? It's not on itunes.
- I have all their discography, if you want I could give to you--Marco jm/Marcojm
- Note please do not discuss illegal music sharing here. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:23, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- I know this is over a year old but 1. I see nothing mentioning illegal music sharing. 2. Don't fucking whine. カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! (talk) 15:39, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
- Note please do not discuss illegal music sharing here. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:23, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Sacredreich.jpg edit
Image:Sacredreich.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 10:29, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Merge proposal edit
Alive at the Dynamo into Sacred Reich
Alive at the Dynamo doesn't seem to meet the guidelines at WP:NALBUMS: All articles on albums, singles or other recordings must meet the basic criteria at the notability guidelines, with significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
Albums
An album requires its own notability, and that notability is not inherited and requires independent evidence. That an album is an officially released recording by a notable musician or ensemble is not by itself reason for a standalone article. Conversely, an album does not need to be by a notable artist to require a standalone article if it meets the general notability guideline. Album articles with little more than a track listing may be more appropriately merged into the artist's main article or discography article, space permitting.
I have added the one review I could find. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 22:00, 27 January 2013 (UTC)