Talk:Saab 2000

Speculation

From the article:

Some have speculated that the high cost of regional jet operation is partially to blame for the plague of bankruptcy that has hit the airline industry, something that high-speed turboprops like the Saab 2000 and its competitors would have prevented.

This may be true, and is an interesting thought, but given Wikipedia editorial standards, I don't think this is appropriate for inclusion because it is reporting speculation instead of established facts. If this is indeed a fact, citations and references may be required. This statement may also fall afoul of the No Original Research policy as well. Opinions? Dsf 06:12, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Total

In November 2006 a total of 44 Saab 2000 aircraft remain in airline service, with Carpatair (14), Darwin Airline (3), Eastern Airways (4), FlyLal (2), Golden Air (5), Moldavian Airlines (2), Ostfriesische Lufttransport (3), Portugalia (2), Régional (6) and Swiss International Air Lines (8).[1]

The total is 49, not 44, and I know that Darwin Airline has 4 and not 3 As of July 2006). Probably the section should be fixed by someone knowledgable as it is impossible to follow through. I leave it there, as it still provides some information, but it should be corrected. Disciple of the Eighth Day 19:00, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

FlyLAL now has 5 SAAB-2000, as it is clearly stated on their website.

Yes, I believe that the above list of aircrafts in service must be updated. Ever since Lufthansa acquired the company, Swiss International Air Lines has no longer any Saab 2000: During the year, SWISS reduced its fleet by eleven aircraft. In order to simplify the fleet structure and to focus on Avro RJ-100/ RJ85 in regional traffic, the last remaining Saab 2000 was withdrawn from service at the end of the summer schedule in October 2005. The flight programme remains attractive as a result of the gradual introduction of six additional Avro jets, the cooperation with partner airlines and, in particular, the association with Lufthansa —The preceding unsigned comment was added by PetterLundkvist (talk • contribs) 19:55:44, August 19, 2007 (UTC).

Considering the success the Q400 has had, why was the Saab 2000 a failure. They both are prop planes with the same speed and range yet no one uses the Saab 2000. At the very least the Saab 2000 has got to be more efficient than the slow and ineficient Avro 85. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.53.147.8 (talk) 06:13, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

References

Maritime patrol aircraft demonstrator

http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/farnborough-saab-to-outfit-saab-2000-as-maritime-patrol-aircraft-demonstrator-374193/

Worth a mention yet? Or will this be folded in favor of the Piaggio MPA (which actually has money behind it). Hcobb (talk) 16:59, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

If it gets off paper, and an aircraft is actually converted to a demonstrator,then it will be worth a mention in the varients section. Whether either will sell (competing against ATR-42s and the ubiquitous King Air) is a different question.Nigel Ish (talk) 17:19, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

A SAAB 2000 was marked up as the "SAAB 2000 Swordfish MPA" was on display at the Royal International Air Tatoo last week. MilborneOne (talk) 17:39, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Does paint count as an aircraft variant these days? Hcobb (talk) 19:52, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://www.aerospace-technology.com/projects/saab_2000/

  Triggered by \baerospace-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 11:10, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 19:38, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

removal of "<<importance section|date=December 2023>>" tag

the captioned deals with 3 incidents (before the editing done on 16 March 2024): 2 hull losses and one other incident (Loganair flight: overspeed & loss control)

Editing on one of the hull losses incident: adding the registion of the aircraft, and also adding "Saab 2000"

Editing done on the Loganair flight: mainly adding the wordings "When the commander made nose-up pitch inputs the aircraft did not respond as he expected. After reaching 4,000 ft the aircraft ......exceeded the applicable maximum operating speed" that was previously absent in the text.

"aircraft (seemingly) did not respond the commander" PLUS "exceeded the applicable maximum operating speed" would pinpoint what exactly the problems are, and two of the reasons that why the incident deserves the word "serious" as used by AAIB & also the inclusion in "Mayday" episode.

Further reasons will be given below shortly. KCLAW1207 (talk) 15:41, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Regarding whether "Hull losses" incidents deserves an inclusion, I found, in some other wiki articles for other types of aircrafts…

…Hull losses incidents without serious injury are quite common to be included in the main text, examples:

"Hull losses" incidents with no serious injury (nor death): DHC Dash 8, Airbus A340.

Even the incident that the aircraft is repaired, with no serious injury (nor death) can also be included. Example: Fokker 70. KCLAW1207 (talk) 17:11, 16 March 2024 (UTC)