This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
Good job on these two articles. The same issues can be seen on both. For one, I would like to see the prose referenced. Also, I would like to see a stub made on both shipbuilding companies. Other than that, these articles look in much better shape than the one that you rushed previously. ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢDrop me a line 17:36, 25 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Also, keep this in mind: Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 200 tons, use 200 tons, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 200 tons.ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢDrop me a line 17:39, 25 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
The lead is not cited per WP:LEADCITE and ample precedent. Quantities and units generated by {{convert}} have the non-breaking space inserted automatically. For others, I don't use the , but instead a keyboard entered hard space " " (option + space bar on a Mac). — Bellhalla (talk) 20:43, 25 September 2008 (UTC)Reply