Talk:SMS Medusa (1864)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Medusa (1864)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 03:03, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

This article is in fine shape. A few comments from me:

• the rounding of the length in the infobox and body doesn't match
  • Forgot the "in" part
• the draft is converted into decimal feet in the body, should be ftin
  • I could've sworn I fixed all of these when I started writing this series - apparently not.
• the engine didn't drive the boilers, it was the other way around. Reword?
  • Good catch, that hadn't occurred to me ;)
• where were the guns positioned? all broadside?
  • Yes
• Prussian Ministryer of War
  • Good catch
• link ship commissioning
  • Done
• suggest "deployment in the interest of improving the crew's rations, rather than relying entirely on hardtack."
  • That works for me
• suggest "necessity offor their presence"?
  • Done
• perhaps mention Saint Thomas was a Danish possession at the time
  • Good idea
• perhaps translate Unterleutnant zur See as you've done with the other rank
  • Done
• perhaps note that Halifax is in Nova Scotia (or Canada)
  • Good catch.

That's it. Placing on hold for the above to be addressed. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:28, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks Peacemaker! Parsecboy (talk) 11:49, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, contains no plagiarism, and is illustrated by an appropriately licensed image with an appropriate caption. Passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:26, 18 August 2018 (UTC)