Talk:SL79

SL79 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 20, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed

Trains: Streetcars Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
Sel	week 30, 2010

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Streetcars.

Norway

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:SL79/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ---Dough 48 72 00:54, 20 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Comments:

The sentence "The trams can seat 77 passengers, with an additional 91 people able to stand, with seating three and four abreast." sounds fragmented and needs to be reworded.
"Trams no. 101 through 113 was put into service" sounds awkward.
Combine the sentences "The first vehicle was delivered on 4 August 1989 and was taken into service on 11 October. The last was put into service on 27 August 1990."
Remove comma and the word "so" in sentence "Series two was delivered with vandal-proof seats, that proved so uncomfortable that they quickly were replaced."
The entire article relies on only three references. Are there any other additional references that can be added?

I am placing the article on hold. ---Dough 48 72 00:54, 20 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review. I added a few more sources, but the three existing articles are about as reliable as it gets (two featured articles in a magazine plus the actual delivery brochure from the manufacturer). Arsenikk ^(talk) 12:35, 20 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

I will pass the article. ---Dough 48 72 16:33, 20 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic