Wikipedia

Talk:Royal Canadian Air Cadets

Latest comment: 10 months ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic GA Reassessment
Learn more about this page
Former good articleRoyal Canadian Air Cadets was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 21, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
May 13, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
May 28, 2007Good article nomineeListed
June 24, 2008Good article reassessmentKept
January 2, 2024Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Rank Table

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

The NEW rank table looks exactly the same as the one present before the re-write but it does look nice. I changed the pre-requisites for LAC as the CATO was changed to only requiring 5 months time in almost 2 years ago. You could probably add the pre-requisites for FCpl into the table as they have been promulgated in the recently amended CATO 55-04. Too bad they still haven't told us what the rank will actually look like CU L8R AV8R ... J-P 14:27, 27 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

The reason that I trimmed the table is because one of the criteria at Wikipedia:What is a good article? is "stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary details". I thought that the table went into a bit too much detail. Does a general reader need to know prerequisites for ranks? Or are the names, badges, and relative ordering of the ranks sufficient? Sancho 15:14, 27 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
If that info isn't anywhere else on Wikipedia, it might be worthy of inclusion - especially as, if expanded, the level training can be covered in relation to the various ranks. Clear as mud? Quadra 05:04, 3 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, it's not too bad. I remember about half a year ago, this article even included quotas for numbers of ranks dependent on squadron size... so in comparison, the article has become much more relevant to a general reader. I don't think though that we should include the detailed rank prerequisite information because it isn't anywhere else on Wikipedia; we need a better reason for including it like... is it encyclopedic? does it deserve as much weight as it is given with respect to the other information in the article? Especially because it is in a table, it's the one thing that stands out in this page (aside from the pictures). Any more thoughts? Sancho 16:21, 17 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

I do think the prerequisite information ought to remain, and I plan to re-jig the table, as I find the current one a little hard to follow. Fhsig13 (talk) 18:57, 18 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Royal Canadian Air Cadets. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:47, 5 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 33 external links on Royal Canadian Air Cadets. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:12, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Badges

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I think that the uniform badges should be added to this page. Since I'm new, I do not know how to do so. Can someone please check out this site http://754aircadets.ca/?page_id=328 and add the uniform badges.

Weedoe (talk) 04:47, 24 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Removing CPU section

edit
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

{{request edit}}

The Cadet Program Update (CPU) shaped the modern cadet program, adding proficiency levels and EOs/POs. It was instituted in 2008/2009, and I'm thinking that the information is no longer relevant in the "local training" category. Should it be [re]moved? Slightlyjealous (talk) 21:00, 8 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

edit
Latest comment: 10 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Royal Canadian Air Cadets

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:55, 2 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

This 2007 listing contains significant uncited material, and thus does not meet GA criterion 2b). It may also contain excessive details on matters such as uniform, training courses and centres, and performance objectives, which are near-entirely sourced to non-independent sources. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:39, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Auto-edded, dupe W/L scanned, Canadian national spelling exception, minor CE, revert as desired, Regards ex-384 Sqn, East Midlands Wing, ATC. Keith-264 (talk) 14:49, 26 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Royal_Canadian_Air_Cadets&oldid=1210267950"