Talk:Royal Albion Hotel

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Royal Albion Hotel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6Dus2kPHo?url=http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/caring/listing/listed-buildings/ to http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/caring/listing/listed-buildings/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.imagesofengland.org.uk/StatisticsPage/default.aspx?StatsCounty=EAST%20SUSSEX

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:25, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

GA Reassessment

Royal Albion Hotel

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Nominator's issues have been addressed. 123Writer ^talk 12:56, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Lots of CN's close to the end of the article, mild copyediting is also required. Doesn't look like there's a lot of citations for the size of the article. Orange tags at 2023 fire and Historical sketches and hotel guests. 🌶️Jalapeño🌶️ Don't click this link! 20:42, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Will work on this ASAP. There has been much editing recently because of the fire; haven't had a chance to work on it yet. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 20:49, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Quick comments:

• The "historical sketches and hotel guests" section was not present at the time this article was promoted to GA (actually, it was added here without sources in 2020). The unsourced portions of this section should either be removed or backed up by reliable sources
• The 2023 fire section suffers from recentism; the need for copyediting may be related to the disproportionate length of this section, which seems overly detailed. I'd recommend cutting this to one paragraph, which may also resolve these grammatical issues.
• The "Present day" section may need to be updated to reflect the impact of the 2023 fire.

Otherwise, the article doesn't look that bad. In response to @Jalapeño's GAR statement, the GA criteria do not require a certain amount of citations in proportion to the size of the article; they only require that everything is backed up by a reliable source. – Epicgenius (talk) 17:11, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Cut down the 2023 fire section. Citations still needed for that last section. 123Writer ^talk 19:50, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Though I'll add I don't really think that section is even necessary. It should be cut down to the most notable and relevant verified guests (the "three aristocratic guests" story and the whole Gilbert can-can thing definitely should go), or cut entirely. 123Writer ^talk 19:56, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Couldn't find anything about Sackville staying at the Albion. Only the Metropole also in Brighton (The Bolter, Osbourne 2009). Found sources for everything else though. 123Writer ^talk 11:25, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

@Jalapeño Have your issues been adequately addressed? 123Writer ^talk 04:39, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

From what I see, they have. 🌶️Jalapeño🌶️ Don't click this link! 10:21, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Latest

With some extra bits. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 18:58, 2 August 2023 (UTC)