Talk:Rothschild (Fabergé egg)
 | A fact from Rothschild (Fabergé egg) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 December 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Rothschild Clock price records
editI removed the reference to the Rothschild clock named by Christies the 'Rothschild Egg' being the most expensive piece 'ever sold'. It is the most expensive piece 'sold at auction' but there is no evidence for or serious reference to it being the most expensive timepiece, Russian or Faberge object ever sold anywhere. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.103.3.182 (talk) 20:38, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Needs infobox
edit{{Infobox Fabergé egg}} like the other egg articles. — MrDolomite • Talk 04:28, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Rothschild (Fabergé egg). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120611025120/http://www.christies.com:80/features/nov07/7461/overview.asp to http://www.christies.com/features/nov07/7461/overview.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:59, 21 March 2016 (UTC)