Talk:Rose Valley financial scandal
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Unreal7 in topic Rose Valley financial scandal
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rose Valley financial scandal article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Rose Valley financial scandal
editHi, @Unreal7:, @Shyamsunder:, @Kailash29792:, @Dharmadhyaksha: I have created a new article Rose Valley financial scandal, could pls help develop it as early as possible because someone shall come and might delete the article. Its massive scam amounting Rs 17,000 Crore and covering across three Indian states where 18 lakh people have duped. The scam is similar to Saradha Group financial scandal. Thanks--Anandmoorti (talk) 05:11, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- Why us four? Unreal7 (talk) 09:25, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Unreal7: Because you four are highly experience in Wikipedia thats why moreover you guys are Indian wikipedian.--Anandmoorti (talk) 05:22, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- I'm not Indian. That was a joke on my page, just like my being born on Gallifrey. Unreal7 (talk) 06:26, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Unreal7: Because you four are highly experience in Wikipedia thats why moreover you guys are Indian wikipedian.--Anandmoorti (talk) 05:22, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- Why us four? Unreal7 (talk) 09:25, 5 January 2017 (UTC)