Talk:Rochester Telephone Corporation

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Steel1943 in topic Requested move 28 August 2017

Requested move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Rochester Telephone (New York) per consensus and WP:NCCORP. R'n'B (call me Russ) 13:58, 27 April 2011 (UTC)Reply


}

Global Crossing North AmericaRochester Telephone Company (NY) — More notable as Rochester Telephone Corporation founded in 1877 vs Global Crossing North America which only existed during 2000-2001. Proposing Rochester Telephone Company (NY) to differentiate from Rochester Telephone Company (IN). --Ajh1492 (talk) 23:28, 20 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Then the Indiana page needs to be renamed also. Ajh1492 (talk) 17:49, 26 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
As far as I can tell, there is no Indiana page. Powers T 19:54, 26 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 28 August 2017

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 16:08, 7 September 2017 (UTC)Reply


Rochester Telephone (New York)Rochester Telephone Corporation – The only other sensible destination for the title Rochester Telephone is Frontier Telephone of Rochester. As both companies were based in New York state, (New York) is not a useful disambiguator. Certes (talk) 14:27, 28 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

  • Support move, and merge the short article about Frontier Telephone of Rochester into this one. A wider merge with Frontier Communications would be too confusing, given the convoluted corporate history, mergers and ownership changes. However, both article should be clarified and scoped appropriately. In particular, the extensive list of Frontier subsidiaries looks off-topic in this article if we limit its scope to the historical Rochester Telephone Corporation. — JFG talk 15:10, 28 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.