Talk:Robin Monotti Graziadei

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Robin Monotti Graziadei. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130106230039/http://thehill.greatbritishlife.co.uk:80/article/architect-robin-monotti-graziadei-speaks-about-designing-the-water-fountains-at-kensington-gardens-31302 to http://thehill.greatbritishlife.co.uk/article/architect-robin-monotti-graziadei-speaks-about-designing-the-water-fountains-at-kensington-gardens-31302/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:52, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

"Social Media" chapter is not neutral

To quote: "Robin also exposed the cover up of the Covid19 gene modifying injection adverse events, and provided evidence based science showing how also most other vaccines are not proven to be either safe or effective. These views put him at odds with the majority of the architecture profession who fell for the propaganda of the scientifically unproven CO2 narrative, as the ARB and RIBA have declared a climate emergency and much of their policy relates to tackling it by reducing carbon usage and emissions, which Robin considers entire futile and based on flawed narratives that are entirely un-scientific as they fail to consider natural solar cycles.". "scientifically unproven CO2 narrative", "exposed the cover up", "fell for the propaganda"... this part is not only grammatically wonky but is also selling conspiracy talk and anti-vaxx posts on X as fact without any reflection. The "CO2 Narrative" is not "scientifically unproven" and it's certainly not "Propaganda". Tooom8 (talk) 20:23, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

The bigger issue with the social media section is that all of the sources about his social media were referenced to the social media itself. With no independent sourcing, it is reasonable to remove the section—and especially to remove any interpretation of his posts. —C.Fred (talk) 11:31, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

I agree, it is correct to remove the social media section until there is independent sourcing. IppolitoG (talk) 09:56, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

Architect is a protected title

Robin Monotti Graziadei is not, and has not been, on the Architects Registration Board register and therefore is not an architect under UK law. His qualifications also do not align with those of a typical architect. Owning an architecture practice or gaining an architecture undergraduate degree does not make you a qualified architect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.14.38.126 (talk) 09:22, 4 Oct 2024 (UTC)

What, then, is the acceptable generic term? —C.Fred (talk) 11:56, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Building designer? Interior designer? Architecture graduate? (Personal attack removed) 86.14.38.126 (talk) 12:29, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Continued use of the "Architect" title on this page is a violation of the Architects Act 1997 which protects the title. Wikipedia has a duty to ensure this information is accurate yet the title keeps being re-added with no source. And to be clear, (redacted)... it must at least be accurate. 86.14.38.126 (talk) 13:43, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Be careful about any assertions that you make about other editors. There are policies that could call for an immediate block for unfounded allegations of that sort. —C.Fred (talk) 22:42, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Genuine question: why are you continuing to add a description which isn't backed up by fact? Robin is not an architect, there is no proof that he is an architect, yet this page keeps re-adding this false description? 82.31.250.201 (talk) 08:29, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

Robin Monotti Graziadei is a registered architect in the UK Architects Registration Board, registration number 063306B. See for yourself:

https://architects-register.org.uk/Architect/063306B?filterId=Architect IppolitoG (talk) 09:53, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

Could this page please be audited by an administrator? The Architect title, as defined and protected by the ARB and Architects Act 1997, is incorrrect in this case. The register of architects in the UK is public, using the title when you are not registered is illegal. Thanks 82.31.250.201 (talk) 09:39, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

Based on the information presented above, architect is verified, so this admin would deem future removal of it as intentional disruption. —C.Fred (talk) 12:12, 5 October 2024 (UTC)