Talk:Robert III de La Marck
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Favonian in topic Move to Robert III de La Marck
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
The person seems to be the same as Robert Fleuranges III de la Marck. If there are no comments before 1st of march I'll merge the pages--Scafloc 09:06, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
I concur; same person. Eulalie Écho 01:10, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Move to Robert III de La Marck edit
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. Favonian (talk) 17:54, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Robert Fleuranges de La Marck → Robert III de La Marck — Fleuranges isn't even part of his name. Fleuranges was a seigneury he ruled. The French wiki says Robert III de la Marck, dit Fleuranges. Absolutely no sources call this man Robert Fleuranges.--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 17:52, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
- Support per Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (except that he did not "rule" Fleuranges, it was merely a fief he possessed, it was not a sovereignty). FactStraight (talk) 16:19, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.