Talk:Robert Boulter

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Whiteguru in topic GA Reassessment
Former good articleRobert Boulter was one of the Media and drama good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 13, 2013Good article nomineeListed
May 25, 2021Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

 

GA Reassessment

edit
This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Robert Boulter/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.


Starts GA Reassessment. The reassessmment will follow the same sections of the Article. --Whiteguru (talk) 06:35, 16 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Instructions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment

 

Result: Delisted. Legitimate concerns, no opposition or improvements made --Whiteguru (talk) 05:28, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Reply


Observations

edit
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  • Reference 1 is primary, and cites two Wikipedia pages. Neither reference Robert Boulter.
  • Reference 2 is a mention, not really a reliable source.
  • Reference 3 goes to the Wikipedia page for the defunct Independent on Sunday
  • Reference 4 goes to the Wikipedia page for The Herald (Glasgow)
  • Reference 5 goes to the Wikipedia page for Evening Standard
  • Reference 6 goes to the Wikipedia page for Judge John Deed
  • Ditto Reference 7,8,9,10. All go to Wikipedia pages and not sources.
  • Reference 11 is a dead link
  • Reference 14 is a dead link
  • References 15,16,17 all go to Wikipedia pages and not the source.
  • Reference 22 is a 404, reference 23 goes to the Wikipedia page for Doctors.
  • Reference 25 is likely a permanent dead link
  • Reference 27 goes to the Wikipedia page for Daylight Robbery (2008 film)
  • References 32, 33 go to the Wikipedia page for Waking the Dead.
  • Ditto References 34,35
  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  • This article suffers from WP:PROSELINE - he starred in this, he performed that role here, this role there.
  • There is no significant notability here except for a claim to fame as a (trial) stand-in for a young Luke Skywalker in The Force Awakens.
  1. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  • Given the number of links to roles played by this actor without proper references, this page appears to be WP:FANCRUFT
  1. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  • Page created 11 October 2012
  • 62 edits to this page by 36 editors in that time.
  • Page achieved GA status on 13 July 2013
  • Page creator is blocked for sockpuppetry, 26 November 2020
  • There are no other significant editors except bots and page checkers.
  • may need reassessment was added on 27 April 2021;
  1. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  • Page is not illustrated with any images. It has tables of acting roles.
  1. Overall:

 

 

  Delisted as Good Article