Talk:Rikki

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Number 57 in topic Requested move 14 March 2022

Requested move 14 March 2022 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Number 57 14:36, 2 May 2022 (UTC)Reply


Rikki (name)Rikki – Obvious primary topic. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:31, 14 March 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 14:49, 21 March 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 06:56, 9 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Note: WikiProject Anthroponymy has been notified of this discussion. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 06:56, 9 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Support. Rikki was the title of the article about the Japanese singer for 10 years until 2019, then it got retargeted to Rikki (name). Looking at pageviews and article content, it's clear there's no primary topic for the term, so Rikki (name) (which is really only a disambiguation page) should be moved to the base title. Bagumba suggests splitting into a core dab page and a given name index: in principle, this is needed either when both resultant pages would be relatively long (so that long lists of people don't impede the navigation from the dab page), or when the name index is an actual article with encyclopedic content about the name. Neither of these conditions are met here; readers won't be served well if they're presented initially with just two of the entries and they have to click through to another page to see the rest. – Uanfala (talk) 20:02, 9 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Support, obvious primary topic. By far the most of the entries are about people named Rikki, and quite many of the "see also" entries use altogether different spellings. By the way, "rikki" means both "sulphur" and "broken" in Finnish, but this is just an interesting mention here, and has no bearing on the move discussion. JIP | Talk 01:36, 23 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.