Talk:Right to Dream Park

Football Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Denmark Low‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 3 March 2019 edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments5 people in discussion

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Moved as proposed, after extended time for discussion. bd2412 T 22:36, 19 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Farum Park → Right to Dream Park – This doesn't look like a temporary commercial name. WikiArticleEditor (talk) 09:55, 3 March 2019 (UTC)--Relisted. – Ammarpad (talk) 07:17, 12 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Oppose move. Commercial or not, it's still a sponsor name. ONR (talk) 18:43, 3 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. Giant Snowman 14:16, 4 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Support - not a sponsor name, it has been renamed by the club. Giant Snowman 14:24, 4 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
Support I get that some people don't like sponsor names, but it's the name, and WP:IDONTLIKEIT is not a valid argument. Smartyllama (talk) 17:10, 14 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic