Talk:Reactions to Executive Order 13769

Classifications of jihadists

edit

I'm not comfortable with the inclusion of jihadists under "Religious groups" along with Catholic, Baptist, and Jewish organizations. Jihadist organizations are terrorist organizations, and are not mainstream religious or even Islamic organizations. I had attempted to change the section level to make it a separate section, but another user reverted it. Antony–22 (talkcontribs) 22:17, 7 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Scope and title of this article

edit

We have a problem with how to deal with the fact that there are two Executive Orders imposing a travel ban: the original order 13769, and 13780 which superseded it. Back in January we created multiple articles about 13769: Legal challenges to Executive Order 13769, Reactions to Executive Order 13769, Protests against Executive Order 13769, and List of protests against Executive Order 13769. And then there's Category:Executive Order 13769. We have no comparable articles about 13780, and the 13769 articles have barely been updated to mention 13780. For example, the "Legal challenges" article doesn't even mention the court orders blocking 13780.

We need to decide how to handle this. Should the existing articles be updated and given a more inclusive title, such as "Reactions to Trump travel orders"? Or should comparable (and probably highly duplicative) articles be created called "Reactions to Executive Order 13780"? I really don't think the current situation is acceptable, where there is a ton of information under the name of the superseded policy and nothing under the one that replaced it.

I have tried to start a discussion about the scope and title of these articles at Talk:Legal challenges to Executive Order 13769. Please join that discussion and let's figure out how to handle this. Pinging @Antony-22 and JayCoop: --MelanieN (talk) 20:36, 25 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Merge with Protests Against Executive Order 13769 Article

edit

I believe that it would be great to , merge this Wikipedia article with a similar Wikipedia article titled "Protests against Executive Order 13769".(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protests_against_Executive_Order_13769?fbclid=IwAR0Im6qxnYraRQdBl5XPwhxl2gpitpVb8-PSVHvYhf4OZ5R2PDIKV5majgA)Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page). I believe that both articles touch on important concepts of the reactions/protests and would be great to merge the two articles. If we can merge these 2 articles the reactions and protests to the Executive order 13769 would be more complete. In addition to this merge I believe that it would be very beneficial to add a detailed section on the article about the online protests that took place against and for the executive order 13769. Examples of social movements that became popular on social media are #nobannowall and #grandparentsnotterrorists hashtags. Please let me know what you think about merging these 2 article and creating a detailed and complete article about the protests/reactions to the Executive order 13769. --CanKaya1 (talk) 03:44, 10 April 2019 (UTC) CanKaya1 (talk) 03:44, 10 April 2019 (UTC)CanKaya1Reply